Washington, D.C. — President Donald Trump announced on Monday that Secret Service protection for Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, will be revoked immediately. The decision also applies to the president’s daughter, Ashley Biden, ending their federal security details.
In a statement, Trump cited unspecified reasons for the decision but emphasized that it would take effect immediately. “Hunter Biden’s Secret Service protection will be revoked effective immediately. The same applies to Ashley Biden,” Trump stated.
The move comes amid ongoing political tensions and legal challenges involving Hunter Biden, who is currently facing federal charges related to tax and firearms violations. However, there has been no official indication from the Biden administration or the Secret Service that these legal matters played a role in the decision.
Under federal law, the U.S. Secret Service provides protection to the president, vice president, and their immediate families. While there is no constitutional obligation for adult children of presidents to receive Secret Service protection indefinitely, they are typically covered for the duration of their parent’s time in office and sometimes beyond, depending on security assessments.
Historically, security details for presidential family members have been adjusted or extended based on perceived threats and security needs. In some cases, individuals have voluntarily declined protection. In others, the government has scaled back or reassessed protection levels based on cost concerns or evolving security conditions.
The revocation of Hunter and Ashley Biden’s protection is notable as such decisions are typically made following consultations between the Secret Service and White House officials rather than announced publicly by a sitting president. Neither the Secret Service nor the White House has yet issued an official response to Trump’s declaration.
Critics of the decision argue that stripping Secret Service protection from Hunter and Ashley Biden could expose them to potential security risks, particularly given the heightened political climate. Supporters of the move, however, contend that such protections should not be extended indefinitely and should instead be evaluated based on necessity, cost, and risk assessments.
Hunter Biden has been the subject of intense public scrutiny, with ongoing investigations into his financial dealings and legal matters. However, Ashley Biden has remained largely outside the political spotlight, focusing on her work as a social worker and advocate for social justice causes.
This decision adds another layer of tension between Trump and the Biden family, as the two political figures continue to clash over policy, governance, and personal disputes. It remains unclear whether the Secret Service has already acted upon the directive or if there will be an official reconsideration of the decision in the coming days.
As of now, there is no legal requirement that mandates Secret Service protection for adult children of presidents, leaving the matter largely at the discretion of the administration in power. The response from the Biden administration, if any, could provide further clarity on whether it intends to challenge or accept the revocation.

