The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recently dismissed a supervisor, Marn’i Washington, following accusations that she directed workers to skip houses displaying pro-Trump signs during Hurricane Milton relief efforts in Lake Placid, Florida. Washington claims that her guidance was in line with FEMA’s policy on “avoidance” when encountering potentially hostile situations; however, FEMA’s leadership has criticized her actions as contrary to the agency’s principles of neutrality in disaster response.
The controversy began when reports surfaced that relief teams had bypassed approximately 20 homes with Trump signs, allegedly at Washington’s instruction. Some FEMA employees reportedly recorded comments in the government system, marking the bypassed houses with notes like, “Trump sign no entry per leadership.” This policy sparked public outrage, particularly among those affected by the hurricane who believed they had been denied FEMA’s assistance based on political beliefs.
Deanne Criswell, FEMA’s administrator responsible for employee conduct, confirmed Washington’s termination, describing her actions as “reprehensible” and “in direct violation” of FEMA’s commitment to helping all individuals impacted by disasters without consideration of political leanings. Criswell emphasized that Washington’s decision was made independently and without authorization from higher FEMA officials. FEMA is currently reaching out to homes that may have been overlooked to ensure they receive needed assistance.
Washington defended her actions on a recent episode of the Roland Martin Unfiltered podcast, asserting that her instructions were a protective measure rather than a political statement. According to Washington, FEMA protocol allows teams to avoid homes where there may be hostility toward FEMA workers, and she alleged that some workers had experienced verbal or physical threats from residents at homes with pro-Trump signs. She insists her guidance was based on these incidents and was meant to de-escalate potential conflicts in line with FEMA’s employee safety policies.
This incident has prompted significant backlash, with prominent figures questioning FEMA’s internal oversight. Republican Representative James Comer, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chair, has since called for a congressional hearing on November 19 to investigate the matter further. Washington expressed openness to the congressional review, stating that she welcomed the opportunity to discuss the incident in more detail.
The situation has raised broader questions about FEMA’s operational guidelines and the checks in place to ensure neutrality in disaster relief. Experts suggest that FEMA’s approach to political neutrality is essential to maintain public trust in its mission. FEMA policy typically underscores impartiality, ensuring that all individuals impacted by natural disasters receive aid, regardless of political beliefs or affiliations.
The controversy has reignited conversations about the role of federal agencies and political bias, with calls for FEMA to clarify its policies on situations where workers may feel endangered. As the agency works to address any potential service gaps and reaffirm its commitment to its core principles, public scrutiny remains intense, with many awaiting the results of the forthcoming congressional review.
This story underscores the critical balance FEMA must maintain between employee safety and an unwavering commitment to provide impartial, comprehensive assistance during disaster recovery efforts.
