Former County Commissioner John West and his cronies seem unwilling to accept the results of his recall, continuing to push their narratives both outside and inside the halls of Josephine County government. Reports have surfaced that West has been a daily presence at the courthouse and commissioners’ offices since his removal from office, influencing decision-making and community perspectives for those willing to listen. Despite being terminated, West appears determined to maintain his influence, raising serious concerns about transparency and accountability.
The upcoming “Lunch and Learn” session, hosted by the United Conservatives of Josephine County at Black Bear Diner from 12 -1 on February 6, 2025, is yet another example of these efforts. The event, featuring West as the keynote speaker, is billed as an opportunity to discuss his recall, ongoing legal battles, and the controversial wildfire hazard map under SB 762. However, this session has sparked some frustration among residents over its exclusivity. Attendance is limited to those who RSVP, with a clear preference for conservative-minded individuals and independent voters.
Such restrictions fly in the face of what should be a community-wide conversation about matters that affect everyone. Topics like ethics charges, recall petition laws, and the wildfire hazard map are not partisan issues—they are public concerns that deserve input and scrutiny from all members of the community. Limiting access to these discussions raises valid questions about whether these events are designed to inform or to propagate a one-sided narrative.
West’s continued involvement in county affairs, despite his recall, only amplifies these concerns. His narrative, now confined to selective gatherings like this one, is being pushed to a curated audience rather than shared openly with the entire community. The exclusion of residents from this conversation undermines the principles of transparency and inclusivity, which are cornerstones of healthy civic engagement.
The wildfire hazard map debate, for instance, impacts property owners, environmentalists, and local businesses alike. Critics of SB 762 claim it imposes unnecessary burdens on property rights, while supporters argue it is a necessary step to mitigate wildfire risks. Both perspectives deserve a platform, but exclusivity prevents a fair and balanced discussion from taking place.
Community events addressing public matters should not cater to a specific group while sidelining others. Every resident should have the chance to listen, question, and decide for themselves what constitutes truth and what amounts to rhetoric. A closed-door approach sends the wrong message: that some voices matter more than others.
Organizers of this event have an opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to true civic engagement by opening the session to all residents or providing a livestream option to ensure broader access. These topics are too important to be confined to a selective audience, especially when they have implications for the entire county.
As we approach February 6, the community deserves clarity: Is this about promoting honest dialogue and accountability, or is it a calculated effort to perpetuate a narrative that serves the interests of a few? The question is not whether residents agree or disagree with John West—it is whether everyone has an equal opportunity to hear, decide, and engage in shaping the future of Josephine County.
Inclusion is not just a principle; it is a responsibility. Let’s ensure it is upheld.
