As the generations shift, so do the values and expectations we hold for our leaders. Those born before the 1970s were raised in an era that emphasized ethics, qualifications, and accountability. These standards were the bedrock of a functional society where leaders were expected to be well-educated, competent, and guided by principles. However, those born after the 1990s seem to have grown accustomed to a different norm—one where mediocrity is tolerated, and identity politics often overshadow competence.
The pre-1970s generation was shaped by a world that demanded excellence. Education was a cornerstone of success, and leaders were expected to be well-informed and capable of making decisions that benefited the greater good. There was a clear understanding that positions of power came with responsibility and that leaders should be judged on their merits, not on superficial factors.
In contrast, the post-1990s generation has grown up in a world where the standards for leadership have become increasingly blurred. The rise of social media, the emphasis on political correctness, and the growing influence of identity politics have contributed to a landscape where qualifications and competence are often overshadowed by other factors. The younger generation seems to have accepted that leaders can be unqualified, unethical, or even incompetent, as long as they fit certain identity criteria.
This shift in expectations has had far-reaching consequences. When incompetence is accepted, the quality of governance declines. Policies are poorly implemented, public trust erodes, and the very foundation of democracy is weakened. Leaders who are unqualified or who lack ethical standards are more likely to engage in corrupt practices, prioritize personal gain over public service, and fail to address the pressing issues facing society.
Furthermore, the acceptance of mediocrity in leadership positions sends a dangerous message to future generations. It implies that standards don’t matter, that education and qualifications are irrelevant, and that anyone can lead, regardless of their competence. This undermines the importance of hard work, dedication, and the pursuit of excellence.
It is imperative that we return to the values that once guided our society. Leaders should be chosen based on their qualifications, their ability to govern effectively, and their commitment to ethical principles. Education should be valued, and those in positions of power should be held to the highest standards.
We must reject the notion that identity should trump competence and that mediocrity is acceptable. Instead, we should demand more from our leaders—more integrity, more expertise, and more accountability. By doing so, we can ensure that our society is led by individuals who are not only capable but also committed to serving the public good.
The generational divide between those born before the 1970s and those born after the 1990s highlights a troubling trend in our approach to leadership. The acceptance of incompetence and the erosion of standards are issues that must be addressed if we are to preserve the integrity of our institutions. It is time to hold our leaders accountable and demand a return to the values of ethics, education, and excellence that once defined our society. Only then can we ensure a brighter future for generations to come.
