In the latest episode of Josephine County’s unfolding political drama, newly elected County Commissioners Ron Smith and Chris Barnett have announced their finalists to fill the vacant commissioner seat left after the recall of John West. The process, however, has sparked intense debate and allegations of cronyism, with many residents questioning the transparency and integrity of the decision-making process.
Despite receiving 16 applications from a diverse pool of candidates, including highly qualified individuals such as Colene Martin and Darin Fowler, the commissioners have narrowed the field to two familiar faces: Herman Baertschiger, a former commissioner with a controversial past, and Andreas Blech, whose ties to local business interests and former commissioner John West have raised eyebrows. Both finalists are viewed by critics as part of the entrenched “good old boys” network that many residents hoped to dismantle after West’s recall.
The exclusion of candidates like Fowler, who has significant governance experience, and others with fresh perspectives has left the community questioning the commissioners’ motives. Barnett had previously stated a preference for candidates with experience, yet Fowler—who fits that description—was not advanced, fueling speculation that the outcome was predetermined.
During a recent meeting, Barnett suggested that the new commissioner would be hired and sworn in the following day, a statement that implied interviews and thorough vetting were either unnecessary or had already been decided behind closed doors. Such remarks have amplified concerns about a lack of transparency and accountability in the selection process.
Herman Baertschiger’s potential return to the Board of County Commissioners has sparked mixed reactions. While his supporters praise his familiarity with local governance, critics point to his history of controversial decisions and public dissatisfaction.
Baertschiger narrowly avoided a recall during his previous term, ‘retiring’ before formal proceedings could gain traction. His tenure was marked by accusations of mismanagement and a perceived disconnection from public concerns. Many residents fear that his reappointment would signal a return to the same governance issues that led to West’s recall, undermining efforts to bring fresh perspectives to the board.
The inclusion of Andreas Blech in the final shortlist has also raised significant concerns. Blech has been criticized for his defense of John West during the recall process and his involvement in a complaint that led to the termination of a county employee Trish House. His close ties to local business interests, including mining and real estate ventures, have further fueled worries about potential conflicts of interest.
Critics argue that Blech’s appointment could compromise the board’s ability to function impartially, particularly on issues related to land use and development. His connections to the recalled commissioner also cast doubt on whether his priorities align with those of the broader community.
The decision-making process has reinforced perceptions of cronyism among some residents. Both Smith and Barnett received substantial campaign contributions from John West, leading to speculation that their selections are driven more by loyalty to West’s political circle than by the best interests of the county.
This perception was exacerbated by the commissioners’ apparent failure to fully adhere to the requirements outlined in the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Charter. According to the charter, the open job position must be advertised in multiple local newspapers; however, it was reportedly published only in the Daily Courier. The omission of outlets such as the Illinois Valley News and others has led to accusations that the process was intentionally designed to limit public awareness and participation. Furthermore, this oversight raises concerns that the appointment could be deemed “null and void” until the proper procedures are followed, potentially opening the door for additional qualified applicants to be considered.
The narrowing of finalists to two polarizing figures has deepened frustration among residents who feel their voices are being ignored. Many argue that a fairer process would involve open interviews for all applicants, giving the community an opportunity to evaluate the candidates and their qualifications.
Observers have suggested that selecting a candidate with an opposing viewpoint or fresh perspective could foster more balanced governance and encourage meaningful dialogue. Instead, critics fear that appointing Baertschiger or Blech will consolidate the commissioners’ shared agendas, stifling dissenting opinions and perpetuating the status quo.
The stakes are high for Josephine County. With pressing issues such as budget management, infrastructure improvements, and community development on the table, residents are looking for leaders who can prioritize the public good over personal alliances.
If Baertschiger is appointed, critics anticipate further alignment with the interests that have long dominated local politics, potentially alienating residents seeking change. Meanwhile, Blech’s business connections could lead to ongoing ethical questions, diverting attention from critical governance matters.
The swearing-in of the new commissioner is expected to take place imminently, marking a pivotal moment for Josephine County. Whether the commissioners choose to prioritize transparency and community interests or reinforce existing power structures will shape public trust in local government for years to come.
As the county waits, residents are urging their leaders to reconsider their approach. A more inclusive and transparent process could restore faith in the system and demonstrate a commitment to serving the diverse needs of the community. Without such measures, the appointment risks being seen as yet another example of backroom politics, further eroding public confidence in local governance.
For Josephine County to move beyond its current controversies, its leaders must embrace openness, accountability, and a genuine commitment to representing all residents. The community deserves a selection process that prioritizes qualifications, integrity, and the ability to address the county’s challenges with fairness and vision.
In the days ahead, the actions of Commissioners Smith and Barnett will be under intense scrutiny. Their decision will either reinforce long-standing frustrations or signal a new era of leadership grounded in transparency and public service. For the residents of Josephine County, the choice is more than political theater—it’s a defining moment in the county’s ongoing quest for accountable governance.