In response to last week’s editorial regarding the role of wealthy individuals in supporting community causes, I’d like to share some perspective on why certain approaches attract their support, while others may not.
Wealthy individuals often focus on projects that yield sustainable, measurable results—whether financially or in terms of community impact. Many are already heavily invested in initiatives that drive economic growth, creating jobs and opportunities that benefit communities in the long term. These individuals look to fund projects that have the potential to multiply their impact. For instance, they are far more likely to support enterprises that provide long-term solutions, like sustainable farming, rather than temporary fixes, such as a one-time food giveaway.
Applying this perspective to our local situation in Grants Pass, it’s understandable why some wealthy residents may hesitate to donate to low-barrier shelters or other short-term solutions for homelessness. They might view these initiatives as less effective, given that low-barrier shelters often lack a clear path to helping individuals achieve independence. The results of many traditional shelter models can sometimes appear unsustainable, providing a stopgap measure rather than an empowerment pathway that fosters long-term stability.
Conversely, the Gospel Rescue Mission has seen broad community support because its programs aim to equip people with the skills and resources they need to eventually support themselves, rather than rely on ongoing assistance. This goal of fostering independence resonates with those who built their own success through dedication and discipline. It is a model that wealthy individuals, in particular, might view as both compassionate and effective, aligning with their belief in contributing to sustainable progress.
The reality is, if we want more support for social causes, creating an actionable, self-sustaining plan that demonstrates results is critical. Wealthy individuals—who, like anyone, are selective with their resources—often seek transparency and tangible impact. Instead of seeking immediate solutions or “shaming” potential donors, let’s focus on developing robust, self-sustaining programs that empower people to become self-sufficient. When we do this, we’re more likely to find partners who believe in our mission and are willing to invest in our shared goals.
Creating effective change takes time and solid planning, and the success stories from programs like the Mission offer proof that investments in people’s independence can pay dividends for everyone involved. By prioritizing sustainable solutions and cultivating our own contributions as a community, we can attract the type of support that makes a lasting impact.
In short, I encourage us to build innovative solutions and lead by example, demonstrating positive outcomes that speak for themselves. This approach will naturally attract those who share our vision for a self-reliant, thriving community.
