This year, many Josephine County homeowners are experiencing a significant increase in their property taxes, with some facing over an 18% increase. The spike has raised concerns, especially among residents on fixed incomes and young families struggling in a challenging economic climate. As the community grapples with the rising costs, questions have emerged about where the bulk of the money is going and whether the increases are fair for all taxpayers.
A large portion of the property tax revenue is directed to the Three Rivers School District. The district receives substantial funding from local property taxes, but this has led to debates over whether the system is equitable, particularly for seniors who no longer have children in the school system. For many, the increase comes at a difficult time, with inflation and living expenses continuing to rise. “How is this fair to seniors on fixed incomes with no children left in the home?” asked a concerned resident, echoing the frustrations of many in the community.
Adding to the tax burden is a law enforcement levy approved by voters during the primary election, which accounts for a significant part of the increase. The levy aims to bolster public safety by funding law enforcement services, but it has also sparked controversy. While supporters argue that the funds are necessary to maintain adequate police protection and ensure community safety, opponents question whether the increased costs are justifiable given the current economic situation.
“Maybe an 18.65% increase in property taxes is fine with the ‘majority,’ but at some point, we have to start saying no to the long wish list from everybody who wants to add to our property taxes,” one resident commented. The sentiment reflects a growing frustration among those who feel that continual tax hikes are unsustainable, especially for residents with limited financial means. For homeowners on fixed incomes, even small increases in taxes can strain budgets, making it difficult to afford other essentials.
The situation also affects young families, many of whom are already struggling to make ends meet. Rising housing costs, increased utility bills, and higher prices for everyday necessities have left many feeling squeezed. “There are a lot of people who don’t have the funds to continue paying exorbitant increases year over year on taxes,” said a local homeowner, adding that the economic reality for many is already challenging without additional tax burdens.
The tax hike has ignited a broader discussion about the community’s priorities and the balance between funding public services and protecting residents from financial hardship. Some suggest that alternative funding methods, such as voluntary donations, could be a solution for those who strongly support specific causes. Others argue that local government should explore cost-cutting measures to avoid placing the burden on taxpayers.
As election season approaches, multiple tax-related measures will appear on the ballot, giving residents an opportunity to weigh in. Advocates for lower taxes are urging voters to carefully consider the impact of additional levies and to think of the financial situations of their neighbors before supporting new tax increases. “If you feel strongly in favor of a cause, start donating to it. Don’t expect everybody else to pay for things that are important to you and that you can afford to pay for,” one local resident suggested.
The outcome of the upcoming votes will likely shape the future of local taxation and set the tone for how the community addresses financial challenges in the years ahead.
